Letter & Check Launch "Save-A-Game-Warden Fund"
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:19 pm
I've sent $25.00 and the following letter to WDFW. I've also asked Chapter 57 to send a club donation, and I'm asking Washington Lakes readers to send in donations. It doesn't have to be much, whatever you can spare, whether its $25 or $5. These small donations obviously won't raise enough to save a game warden's job. All we're trying to do is get WDFW's attention so they'll consider implementing Craig Bukowski's idea of a license checkoff system, similar to the presidential campaign fund donation box on IRS 1040 forms. That's where the real money is, and that's the only practical way to go after it. For decades, we fishermen have simply been license buyers, taxpayers, and recipients of WDFW services. Now WDFW is in a bind and we, the public, have an opportunity to take things into our own hands and bail them out of a nasty situation. It's the symbolism, not the amount you send, that counts. All I'm asking you to do is plagiarize my letter and mail a small check to WDFW to overcome their inertia and get a ball rolling.
* * * * *
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Attn.: Mr. Joe Stohr, Deputy Director
600 Capitol Way North
Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Subject: Proposal to establish a fund supported by voluntary donations to preserve enforcement officer FTEs slated for reductions-in-force
Dear Mr. Stohr:
You mentioned at Saturday’s IFPAG meeting that WDFW is authorized to accept public donations to help support its programs.
I got to thinking about this, and realized it’s difficult to get people to donate for vague and unspecified causes, but an organized campaign with a concrete objective could produce useful results.
This week, a member of one of our state’s fishing clubs, Craig Bukowski of the Cascade Musky Alliance, posted what I think is a good suggestion in an internet discussion forum. He said,
“With everything being computer generated, it would be easy to give fishermen the option to make a donation towards the stocking of their favorite species like they do with the tax return campaign fund.”
(He is referring to the presidential campaign fund checkoff on IRS 1040 forms.)
If this can be implemented on WDFW’s computer-generated fishing licenses, it might raise a lot of money. I visualize it as either a box the license buyer marks to add a voluntary donation of a set amount (say $2.00) to his license fee, or a blank line that looks like the “Tip” space on a restaurant credit card receipt where the patron writes in the gratuity amount.
You also told the IFPAG group on Saturday that WDFW plans to lay off
10 or 11 enforcement officers because of budget cuts. Sports fishermen don’t like poaching or size and bag limit violations because that hurts our fisheries. So,
we want more, not less, enforcement of fishing regulations.
Well, these two things – raise voluntary donations and saving enforcement positions – go together like peanut butter and jelly. I believe if fishermen realize game wardens’ jobs are on the line, they’ll open their wallets. The obvious time and place to ask them is at the fishing license point-of-sale.
I especially like Mr. Bukowski’s idea because if the appeal for donations is printed on every fishing license, those who don’t donate right away will be reminded of the campaign to save game wardens’ jobs every time they look at their license, and might come around and make a donation the next time they buy a fishing license.
To launch this program, I enclose a check for $25.00, which I request that your staff deposit in a new sub-account in whichever fund is used to receive donations and that they call it the “Save-A-Game-Warden-Fund.”
My idea is that this fund will be used to extend or continue the employment of one or more WDFW enforcement officers who otherwise would be let go due to budget-necessitated reductions in force. If this isn’t practical, or not enough funds are raised, then it’s okay to use my donation to support the expenses of advisory groups like IFPAG, or elsewhere as needed. I would, however, like WDFW to give the idea of saving game wardens’ jobs with voluntary donations a fair trial.
I realize, of course, this is a very ambitious proposal. But let’s say WDFW decides to approach the concept of voluntary donations in a systematic way, using the preservation of game wardens’ jobs as its objection, because this is something that people will rally around. Who knows, it might be wildly successful! If 500,000 license purchasers gave $2 each, that’s $2 million in the biennium, which might be enough to save ALL of the enforcement positions slated for RIFs. The only way to find out if it’ll work is to try it.
If WDFW establishes a “Save-A-Game-Warden-Fund” as I’ve requested, WDFW employees might contribute a significant amount to it. But the key to raising enough money is public donations, and I believe the best way to succeed at that is following up on Mr. Bukowski’s idea for a checkoff system in the license buying process.
Sincerely,
/s/
Don Wittenberger
* * * * *
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Attn.: Mr. Joe Stohr, Deputy Director
600 Capitol Way North
Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Subject: Proposal to establish a fund supported by voluntary donations to preserve enforcement officer FTEs slated for reductions-in-force
Dear Mr. Stohr:
You mentioned at Saturday’s IFPAG meeting that WDFW is authorized to accept public donations to help support its programs.
I got to thinking about this, and realized it’s difficult to get people to donate for vague and unspecified causes, but an organized campaign with a concrete objective could produce useful results.
This week, a member of one of our state’s fishing clubs, Craig Bukowski of the Cascade Musky Alliance, posted what I think is a good suggestion in an internet discussion forum. He said,
“With everything being computer generated, it would be easy to give fishermen the option to make a donation towards the stocking of their favorite species like they do with the tax return campaign fund.”
(He is referring to the presidential campaign fund checkoff on IRS 1040 forms.)
If this can be implemented on WDFW’s computer-generated fishing licenses, it might raise a lot of money. I visualize it as either a box the license buyer marks to add a voluntary donation of a set amount (say $2.00) to his license fee, or a blank line that looks like the “Tip” space on a restaurant credit card receipt where the patron writes in the gratuity amount.
You also told the IFPAG group on Saturday that WDFW plans to lay off
10 or 11 enforcement officers because of budget cuts. Sports fishermen don’t like poaching or size and bag limit violations because that hurts our fisheries. So,
we want more, not less, enforcement of fishing regulations.
Well, these two things – raise voluntary donations and saving enforcement positions – go together like peanut butter and jelly. I believe if fishermen realize game wardens’ jobs are on the line, they’ll open their wallets. The obvious time and place to ask them is at the fishing license point-of-sale.
I especially like Mr. Bukowski’s idea because if the appeal for donations is printed on every fishing license, those who don’t donate right away will be reminded of the campaign to save game wardens’ jobs every time they look at their license, and might come around and make a donation the next time they buy a fishing license.
To launch this program, I enclose a check for $25.00, which I request that your staff deposit in a new sub-account in whichever fund is used to receive donations and that they call it the “Save-A-Game-Warden-Fund.”
My idea is that this fund will be used to extend or continue the employment of one or more WDFW enforcement officers who otherwise would be let go due to budget-necessitated reductions in force. If this isn’t practical, or not enough funds are raised, then it’s okay to use my donation to support the expenses of advisory groups like IFPAG, or elsewhere as needed. I would, however, like WDFW to give the idea of saving game wardens’ jobs with voluntary donations a fair trial.
I realize, of course, this is a very ambitious proposal. But let’s say WDFW decides to approach the concept of voluntary donations in a systematic way, using the preservation of game wardens’ jobs as its objection, because this is something that people will rally around. Who knows, it might be wildly successful! If 500,000 license purchasers gave $2 each, that’s $2 million in the biennium, which might be enough to save ALL of the enforcement positions slated for RIFs. The only way to find out if it’ll work is to try it.
If WDFW establishes a “Save-A-Game-Warden-Fund” as I’ve requested, WDFW employees might contribute a significant amount to it. But the key to raising enough money is public donations, and I believe the best way to succeed at that is following up on Mr. Bukowski’s idea for a checkoff system in the license buying process.
Sincerely,
/s/
Don Wittenberger