Tiger Measurements?

Dedicated to the pursuit of the Noble Muskellunge.
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Post Reply
User avatar
Marc Martyn
Rear Admiral Two Stars
Posts: 4100
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:01 am

Tiger Measurements?

Post by Marc Martyn » Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:02 am

While looking through the gallery, I see a lot of numbers like 42"x 20". Can someone explain this measuring method and why it is used?:-s

User avatar
Deadeyemark
Commander
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: WA

RE:Tiger Measurements?

Post by Deadeyemark » Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:57 pm

Marc,
Measuring muskies has been the norm for a long time since hanging them from their lip or jaw from a scale or lip gripper does then no good whatsoever and can seriously injure them so they can't eat. Similarly, lifting them by their gill covers can and does have an adverse effect on them. A length in inches is not just so you've got a measurement to tell your buddies about, it's needed to fill in the blanks on a lunge(muskellunge)log and in many other musky logs and it's the standard by which these trophies are compared.
I take my length and girth measurements while they're in the water. I use a pliable plastic sewing tape measure. It even floats. Girth is taken at the fattest point. ie: My 4th of Jul ski: 42"x20"
Also, vertical holds can be hard on fish. Their jaws, gills and lips are not designed to support their body weight. A horizontal hold with both hands holding and keeping the fish under control for the few seconds it takes for a good pic is about as good as you can be with them. If you'll notice my semi-vertical hold: It's actually at a pretty good angle with my other hand under it for support and control.
Control is also important since a hard shake could take them right out of your hand and serious injury could occur to you and most deffinitely to the fish as it lands on everything in the boat.
The only ones I weigh are if it looks close to a record(which will be CPR'd)and then it's weighed in the net for support then I can subtract the weight of the net later.
Didn't mean to get off track. Hope it helps Marc.
Share The Thrill,
Practice Catch & Release
Mark

Fishing, Fun & Camaraderie
http://cascademuskyassociation.com/
Dedicated to the Tiger Musky Fishery of the Pacific Northwest


Ducktail Lures
Bikini Baits
Stan Durst Custom Lure Painting
Charlie's Leaders
Northwest Sportsman Magazine

User avatar
Marc Martyn
Rear Admiral Two Stars
Posts: 4100
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:01 am

RE:Tiger Measurements?

Post by Marc Martyn » Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:26 pm

Thanks for the insight. I have never fished for Muskies, but what you say makes perfectly good sense. When I get a sizable trout netted, I weight the fish in the net also. I agree, it is much easier on the fish.:thumright

User avatar
Don Wittenberger
Commander
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Shoreline

RE:Tiger Measurements?

Post by Don Wittenberger » Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:52 am

If you know the length and girth, you can calculate the fish's weight. According to the formula Length X Girth X Girth / 800, Mark's 42" x 20" fish weighed about 21 lbs.

User avatar
bad esox
Lieutenant
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Kent

RE:Tiger Measurements?

Post by bad esox » Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:06 am

Mark,

Great explanation. It is very important that we take care of this "resource" properly. If we wish to continue to have a great fishery in the future we must take care of what we have today.
>----):< A good gamefish is too valuable, to be caught only once.
NW TIGER PAC, Chapter 57 of Muskies, Inc.

Post Reply