Theory: controversy in lure color choice (long)
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:06 pm
First of all, bass can see color by the sole fact that they have rhodopsin in their eyes. Rhodopsin is a chemical that both bass and humans have in their eyes and allows the eye to see color instead of shades of black/gray/white.
Cones- Main structure of eye to see color (contains rhodopsin)
Rods- Main structure of eye to see shades of gray (Bass have much more of these and use them more than humans)
One theory is that bass use more of the rods as light dims and associate to shades of gray more than color. This would mean they relate to shades more in low light situations and in murkier water. For more details on this theory
read Mike D's answer http://westernbass.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38131&f=2 and for even more his cited article.
The second theory comes from Bass Wisdom by Homer Circle. I saw this book in the forum and am reading what this very smart man has to say (many of his conlcusions come scientifically as well as by trial and error)
In chapter 14. What colors make bass bite? He states a few things about the bass's eye.
5x more effective at gathering light than humans.
Scientifically yellow and red were the preferred colors of bass
Hard lure color and translucent lure color differ at a distance
Most importantly he concludes, "To generalize, in hard lures the reds, yellows, and contrasty shades are best most of the time in all water conditions. With plastic worms or other soft, translucent lures, stay with the blues and pruples in clear water, but try brighter colors in low-visibility conditions."
So the controversy is about what to use on what given light and water clarity? Theory one says more light penetration and clarity use colors, while theory two says lighter conditions and clarity requires blue/purple colors in the ultraviolet range.
Additionally theory one says use dark colors in low light, while theory two says use bright colors in low light
Both arguments seem solid. Anything I'm missing? Any experience or further information on this?
Cones- Main structure of eye to see color (contains rhodopsin)
Rods- Main structure of eye to see shades of gray (Bass have much more of these and use them more than humans)
One theory is that bass use more of the rods as light dims and associate to shades of gray more than color. This would mean they relate to shades more in low light situations and in murkier water. For more details on this theory
read Mike D's answer http://westernbass.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38131&f=2 and for even more his cited article.
The second theory comes from Bass Wisdom by Homer Circle. I saw this book in the forum and am reading what this very smart man has to say (many of his conlcusions come scientifically as well as by trial and error)
In chapter 14. What colors make bass bite? He states a few things about the bass's eye.
5x more effective at gathering light than humans.
Scientifically yellow and red were the preferred colors of bass
Hard lure color and translucent lure color differ at a distance
Most importantly he concludes, "To generalize, in hard lures the reds, yellows, and contrasty shades are best most of the time in all water conditions. With plastic worms or other soft, translucent lures, stay with the blues and pruples in clear water, but try brighter colors in low-visibility conditions."
So the controversy is about what to use on what given light and water clarity? Theory one says more light penetration and clarity use colors, while theory two says lighter conditions and clarity requires blue/purple colors in the ultraviolet range.
Additionally theory one says use dark colors in low light, while theory two says use bright colors in low light
Both arguments seem solid. Anything I'm missing? Any experience or further information on this?